
Zalantza
Gizon bat edo emakume bat
hilda dagoenean, gauza
deitzen diogu, ez gizon edo emakume.
Horrek ez al du esan nahi gure ustez
soilik arimek dutela sexua
eta sexua ikusezina dela?
Hortaz, galdera da:
zein da gizona, zein neska,
sexu-osagarri guztiak
adierazle ez badira? Arra al da
esku ahulez bere bularraren kontra
estutzen nauen emakumea,
erigelako isiltasunak,
elokuentzia bilakaturik, esker txarra
leporatzen didanean?
Eta emea al da amodioa egin ostean
oheko izarak esku milikaz lisatu
eta burkoetako ileak hatzez
kentzen dituen gizona?
…Bai argi ikusten dudala
gizona hilketa baten ostean,
gertalekua arreta handiz txukuntzen,
odol orbanak garbitzen txorrotapean,
labana lurperatzen…
Eta zer naiz ni sexuan,
obsesiboki joan-etorrian
gizonaren sastakadetatik emakumearen
gela txiki isilean osatzera?
The Doubt
When a man is dead, or a woman, / We call the corpse not he / Or she but it. Does it / Not mean that we believe / That only the souls have sex and that / Sex is invisible? / Then the question is, who / Is the man, who the girl, / All sex-accessories being no / Indication. Is she / A male who with frail hands / Clasps me to her breast, while / The silence in her sickroom, turning / Eloquent, accuses / Me of ingratitude? / And, is he female who / After love, smoothes out the bed sheets with / Finicky hands and plucks / From pillows strands of hair? / ... How well I can see him / After a murder, conscientiously / Tidy up the scene, wash / The bloodstains under the / Faucet, bury the knife... / And, what am I in sex who shuttles / Obsessively from his / Stabs to recovery / In her small silent room?